Morphological State of Kurashs with Evaluation of Sports Specialization
Keywords:
relevance, variability, wrestling, integral, characters, transverse, empiricalAbstract
Categories of somatotypes of athletes specializing in various types of kurash are established by the methods of anthropometry and by Hit-Carter method. Results of anthropometric parameters showed that somatic state of athletes engaged in various types of kurash are differed. Similarity was found in constitution of kurashs specializing in weightlifting, freestyle kurash and national sport kurash, and endomesomorphic somatotype was determined in 67-83% of athletes, that calculating by points is expressed as 3.3:6:2. Ecto-mesomorphic somatotype dominated among judoists and sambo kurashs and components of body mass were presented as 3,3: 5,4: 2,2 and 2.9: 5.4: 2.3 respectively. Dynanic observation showed that athletes with balanced-mesomorphic somatotype prossess wide adaptation ability, providing an effective rearrangement of morphotype under the influence of training modes of different orientation.
References
1. Dorohov R.N. Basis and prospects of age somatotyping. Theory and practice of physical culture. 2000. N0. P.10;
2. Cogan B.IU. Hereditary and environmental conditioning of body elements. News in sport medical anthropology. M., 1990, issue 1. P. 83-84.
3. Martirosov E.G. Systemic organization of somatic state of athletes and classification of sport specializations. Morphologic problems of sport selection. Collection of research papers. Moscow. 1989. P.5-30.
4. Martirosov E.G. Methods of research in sports anthropology. Moscow, FiS, 1982.
5. Nikityuk B.A. Constitutional aspects of anthropology. Integrative biosocial anthropology" Moscow, 1996. - 220 p.
6. Pavlova O.I. Present day training of young athletes. Moscow, publishing house "Theory and practice of physical culture", 2004 - P. 32-34.
7. Рanasyuk T.V. , Tambovtzeva R.V. Constitutional features of the physical performance of adolescents. VII International Scientific Congress "Modern Olympic Sports and Sport for All", Volume II, Moscow, 2003. - 135 p.
8. Rogozkin V.A. et al. Genetic markers of a person's physical working capacity. // Theory and practice of physical culture. - 2000. N. 12. P. 34 - 36.
9. Rogozkin V.A. Decoding of the human genome and sport. Theory and practice of physical culture, 2006, №6, - P. 60-63.
10. Carter J.L. – “Somatotype characteristics of champion athletes”, Rep, Antrop-Cong. ed. A. Hrdica, Praha, Humpolec. 1969.
11. Timility D. Protocols for Physiological assessment of male and tamale soccer players. In Physiological tests for Elite Athletes, Human Kinetics, 2000, 17, 356-362.
