METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ASSESSING THE RISKS OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES OF TEXTILE ENTERPRISES
Keywords:
textile industry, innovation risk, methodological assessment, risk management, PLM, Uzbekistan, fuzzy logic, risk modeling, enterprise transformationAbstract
This article investigates the methodological principles and tools for assessing the risks associated with the implementation of innovative activities in textile enterprises. The textile sector, particularly in developing economies such as Uzbekistan, is experiencing a dynamic transformation through digitalization, product lifecycle management (PLM), and sustainable technologies. Despite the promising advantages, innovative activities are accompanied by financial, operational, technological, and market risks. The research offers a comprehensive methodological framework integrating qualitative and quantitative tools including SWOT, PEST, Monte Carlo simulations, and fuzzy logic systems for risk evaluation. The results emphasize the need for enterprise-specific risk indicators and a unified national risk management policy in the textile innovation domain.
References
1. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011
2. Gulomov, S., Mirzayev, A., & Karimov, B. (2022). Uzbek Textile Industrial Policy Review. Tashkent: Tashkent Institute of Textile and Light Industry Press.
3. Jin, M., & Choi, H. (2022). Risk mapping in Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) for apparel manufacturing. Journal of Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering, 37(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9568.1000229
4. Kogan, L., Li, D., & Zhang, S. (2020). Stochastic modeling for innovation risk in industrial projects. Industrial Risk Journal, 15(4), 219–234.
5. McKinsey & Company. (2022). The State of Fashion 2022: An Uneven Recovery and New Frontiers. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/state-of-fashion
6. OECD. (2021). Risk Management in Innovation Systems: Policy Guidelines for Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301546-en
7. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (6th ed.). Wiley.
9. Wang, X., & Li, Q. (2020). Fuzzy logic-based approach to risk assessment in textile dyeing innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145103
10. World Bank. (2023). Textiles in Transition: Risk and Opportunity in Sustainable Manufacturing. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39877
11. Uztextileprom Association. (2023). Annual Report on Innovation and Investment in Uzbekistan’s Textile Sector. Tashkent.
12. Ministry of Investments, Industry and Trade of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Sectoral Report on the Performance of Textile Clusters. Tashkent: Government Printing Office.
