Review of Tools and Evidence Base in Public Procurement Outcomes

Abstract

The review focuses on assessing public procurement reforms globally, particularly their impact on value for money and fair access. While procurement systems channel about 15% of global GDP, the evidence base on the effectiveness of various interventions is lacking. This review addresses that gap by analyzing academic and policy sources on procurement reforms such as e-procurement, framework agreements, and transparency mechanisms. The methodological approach includes structured searches and expert consultations.

Key findings indicate that e-procurement tools, such as e-auction and e-notification, increase competition and transparency, reducing prices by up to 17% in certain contexts. However, implementation barriers and high administrative costs often hinder these benefits. Framework agreements and centralized procurement show promise in reducing prices for standardized goods, though the evidence is limited. Civil society monitoring during contract execution demonstrates mixed results, with successes depending on local engagement.

Overall, the review highlights the need for further research, especially in underexplored areas like framework agreements and civil society monitoring. The implications suggest a stronger focus on systematic evaluation and collaboration between governments, civil society, and development institutions to enhance procurement outcomes globally.

This review offers practical guidance for policy interventions aimed at maximizing public procurement efficiency and ensuring broader access, emphasizing the need for a robust evidence base.